Type –Value of expressions

Value semantics c++11

The simple answer is you should write code for rvalue references like you would regular references code, and you should treat them the same mentally 99% of the time. This includes all the old rules about returning references (i.e. never return a reference to a local variable).

Unless you are writing a template container class that needs to take advantage of std::forward and be able to write a generic function that takes either lvalue or rvalue references, this is more or less true.

One of the big advantages to the move constructor and move assignment, is that if you define them, the compiler can use them in cases were the RVO (return value optimization) and NRVO (named return value optimization) fail to be invoked. This is pretty huge for returning expensive objects like containers & strings by value efficiently from methods.

See also:
  • hoy se celebran fiestas
You might also like
Appreciating the value of the semantic web
Appreciating the value of the semantic web
THE ROLE OF SEMANTICS IN COMMUNICOLOGY WITH REFERENCE TO
THE ROLE OF SEMANTICS IN COMMUNICOLOGY WITH REFERENCE TO ...
The Semantics of Lenormand
The Semantics of Lenormand
Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages: Third International Symposium, PADL 2001 Las Vegas, Nevada, March 11-12, 2001 Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science)
Book (Springer)
Related Posts